CO 2 is carried in blood in three different ways. (The exact percentages vary depending whether it is arterial or venous blood). Most of it (about 70%) is converted to bicarbonate ions HCO −
3 by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase in the red blood cells by the reaction CO 2 + H 2 O → H 2 CO 3 → H + + HCO −
3 ; about 7% is dissolved in the plasma; and about 23% is bound to hemoglobin as carbamino compounds.   Hemoglobin, the main oxygen-carrying molecule in red blood cells, carries both oxygen and carbon dioxide. However, the CO 2 bound to hemoglobin does not bind to the same site as oxygen. Instead, it combines with the N-terminal groups on the four globin chains. However, because of allosteric effects on the hemoglobin molecule, the binding of CO 2 decreases the amount of oxygen that is bound for a given partial pressure of oxygen. The decreased binding to carbon dioxide in the blood due to increased oxygen levels is known as the Haldane effect , and is important in the transport of carbon dioxide from the tissues to the lungs. A rise in the partial pressure of CO 2 or a lower pH will cause offloading of oxygen from hemoglobin, which is known as the Bohr effect .
Trump did not even graduate Cum Laude at Wharton. He was not admitted there initially, but had to wait after two years (his SAT scores were not a factor), similiar to how Obama went to Occidental College first, and then to Columbia. However, Obama proved himself later on with great grades, going to graduate school, a high LSAT score, etc., etc.
Trump never did, and probably had help from his dad getting in. His IQ is not 156 (#realitysucks). His IQ is probably around 115, he thinks he can get Bernie to run as an independent, he thinks splitting the Democrats’ vote is some novel brilliant idea that he is the first one to come up with. Perhaps his ego stunts his IQ, but his thought process there shows that his IQ, ego aside, would be probably far less than 115.
Inflation adjusted for his dad’s assets, but not raw cash, he’s still LOST money.
I’m a big advocate of Adwords myself. But I do think many business owners make the mistake of looking at AdWords from a cost-accounting perspective – I’ll admit I once did. An interesting read I picked up this week that explains that a bit more. It looks like I can't post links here but it's called "Your ROI from AdWords is Higher Than You Think" and it's written by David Deppner if you want to look it up. It doesn’t go into the nitty gritty of how much AdWords costs or how much you should spend, specifically, but it does a great job of explaining how to realize and calculate your actual ROI from a business perspective.